From: Adrian M. <ad...@mc...> - 2002-09-05 19:39:17
|
Well, I haven't applied the patch but I have tested performance with top. Although not all of top worked for me (especially the CPU %ages) - I could certainly see that mpg123 is eating close to 100% of processor time for high bitrate samples - 49 seconds of real time being recorded as 49 seconds of process time. But I'm not sure users will want *any* clicks. What do people think? I will apply tyhe patch and have a look. Adrian |