[linuxdc-dev]Re: [dcdev] KOS vs DC Linux vs Blagh; and OSX/Darwin (see bottom)

[M. R. B. <mr...@0x...>]

* RC5Stint <rc5...@ya...> on Sat, Feb 02, 2002:

>=20
> There's this other non-existent "absolute" stuff we've been hearing
> about for like ages.  But why talk about something so utterly
> irrelevant?  It might as well not be mentioned if no one can see it.=20
> After all, if a tree falls in the woods ...
>=20

The first piece of absolute is the patched toolchain you are currently
using.  But hey, after all if it's sitting in your lap...

> And besides, running Linux on a gaming console makes about as much
> sense as Dan Quayle running for President.  It's existence is purely
> academic (the only reason I bother with LinuxDC is to learn about
> embedded Linux.  It has "absolutely" no utility for me.)
>=20

I do concur, with the parenthesised portion of the second sentence.
Everything else stated happens to be hogwash.  LinuxDC is and will
continue to be reference work, as well as being the *only* other Open
Source kit that touches the hardware efficiently and strives to support all
DC hardware.

[CC'd to linuxdc-dev, since other replies in this thread are being
suspiciously dropped by dcdev moderators.]

M. R.