From: Adrian M. <ad...@mc...> - 2002-01-28 23:10:31
|
On Monday 28 Jan 2002 10:48 pm, M. R. Brown wrote: > * John Wiggins <lin...@ho...> on Mon, Jan 28, 2002: > > I take it that it would be too much trouble to look at the maple bus in > > the same light as one would for USB... > > We do ... although you have to question the intelligence of adding all > those Maple drivers in the kernel tree itself. True that USB does, but is > that necessarily the right thing to do? USB does include mass storage, > audio, networking, etc. but it's a heck of a lot more organized (and > standardized) than Maple ever could be. Besides, those USB drivers hook > into other Linux subsystems. I can't imagine what subsystem the maracas > would hook into. > Well, I doubt we'll ever really have maracas drivers, but why should these be treated any differently (in terms of running as kernel code) than, say, a mouse, which is an utterly useless article when it comes to a Dreamcast? > > M. R. |