in the language. ALDA. Yes, like the word romantic, it is a convenient
"exploding word," and in its general application signifies nothing more
than "see how much finer I am than other people!"[1] but in literature
and character I shall adhere to the definition of Madame de Stael, who
uses the word _vulgar_ as the reverse of _poetical_. Vulgarity (as I
wish to apply the word) is the _negative_ in all things. In literature,
it is the total absence of elevation and depth in the ideas, and of
elegance and delicacy in the expression of them. In character, it is the
absence of truth, sensibility, and reflection. The vulgar in manner, is
the result of vulgarity of character; it is grossness, hardness, or
affectation.--If you would see how Shakspeare has discriminated, not
only different degrees, but different kinds of plebeian vulgarity in
women, you have only to compare the nurse in Romeo and Juliet with Mrs.
Quickly. On the whole, if there are people who, taking the strong and
essential distinction of sex into consideration, still maintain that
Shakspear
|
