From: yitzhak b. g. <yit...@ya...> - 2005-09-04 07:30:50
|
I noticed recent postings dealing with FakeTTy, but it's not clear to me what it is or how to implement it. Can somebody please provide documentation. Thank You, Yitzhak Bar Geva --- lin...@li... wrote: > Send Linuxconsole-dev mailing list submissions to > lin...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxconsole-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > lin...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lin...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Linuxconsole-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Future of Ruby: head for the hills (Hugo > Vanwoerkom) > 2. Re: Future of Ruby: head for the hills (Erik > Walthinsen) > > Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 10:10:45 -0700 (PDT) > From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw...@ya...> > Subject: Future of Ruby: head for the hills > To: bruby <lin...@li...> > > Hi, > > Found a neat quote from Vojtech Pavlik in > fa.linux.kernel (Sep 1, 7:23 am): > > ========================================== > > (When) Will there ever be native kernel (and maybe > XFree) support for > > multiple independent keyboards? > > The kernel console is unlikely to ever going to have > that - noone is interested in changing the console > subsystem. > > The current state of input device support in the > kernel, however, allows any userspace program to > access them independently, including keyboards. > > That means multi-user X and possibly a userspace > console implementation (Jon Smirl is planning one) > has > no barriers in the kernel input device > implementation > keeping it from proceeding. > > The problems with multiple VGA cards, etc, are much > harder to solve, though. > ============================================== > > I don't know Jon Smirl, but Aivils of course already > has such a solution with Faketty, working very well, > thank you. > > So head for the hills and while you are running hope > Aivils is running with you. > > Hugo > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 12:45:46 -0700 > From: Erik Walthinsen <om...@vc...> > To: Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw...@ya...> > CC: bruby <lin...@li...> > Subject: Re: Future of Ruby: head for the hills > > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > The problems with multiple VGA cards, etc, are > much > > harder to solve, though. > > Tell me about it. 3+ solid weeks and no go. > > I've traced the problem with my system down to DPMS, > where the Radeon > driver thinks it's waking up the display (confirmed > with initial > instrumentation of the driver), but it never does. > Unfortunately the > hardware is being packed up in 1 hour and gets on > the plane to Bolivia > at 7:15am tomorrow morning, so I just bought > hardware for 4 more > separate computers that we'll try to find space for > in our crates. > > OTOH, I've been running the core machine with just > one video card and X > server for the last few hours while I was > "shopping", and came back to > an X display that wouldn't wake up either. The only > unusual setting in > the xorg.conf appears to be VGAAccess "false", which > is required for the > multi-head configuration to work without the servers > crushing each other. > > I've just removed the VGAAccess option from the > server and started it > up, we'll see if it goes to sleep permanently as > well. If so, > something's wrong with this particular combination > of driver and card, > relative to DPMS. If not, then I've narrowed the > problem down a little > bit more, except that I don't see any obvious > "VGA-class" operations in > the DPMS code, just normal Radeon register pokes. > > Single-server multi-head (xinerama and not) seems to > work just fine with > DPMS, but I haven't had much in the way of > exhaustive testing, simply no > time at the moment. > > Once I get back in 2 weeks I'll be either ordering > cards or using ones > left behind (new mobos might have onboard video, > haven't checked that > yet) and hammering as hard as I can on this problem. > This, and the > inability for the X server to do VGA BIOS > initialization if SingleCard > is "true", seem to be the only issues remaining to > getting multi-seat X > working, not counting all the misc configuration > issues, and > complications with other perhipherals like sound > etc. Those come next. > > I would welcome help from anyone who's interested, > including the Ubuntu > multiseat guys, X and console coders, etc. I think > multi-seat systems, > if they can be made stable and easy to build, are > going to be a huge > deal in less developed countries, due to cost, > power, and space concerns. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxconsole-dev mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxconsole-dev > > |