Re: Is linuxconsole.sf.net untouchable?

[samar <sa...@ef...>]

for what its worth, can I suggest Opal - like ruby short and sweet.

best regards
samar
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aivils" <ai...@un...>
To: <zb...@fr...>
Cc: "James Simmons" <jsi...@pe...>; 
<lin...@li...>; <jsi...@in...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Is linuxconsole.sf.net untouchable?


> On Wednesday 13 April 2005 20:30, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>> > I agree. Ruby should be placed into a attic. We need a new branch with 
>> > a
>> > new name i.e being a type of gem. Also people often got confused about 
>> > the
>> > name because there is a scripting language called ruby. Any suggesting
>> > what the gem name we should us?
>>
>> Korund. That covers almost all. It also refers to how hard the thing is.
>> And I find it a fancy name, too. :-)
>
> Oops. I was think that all is Holywood movie names :o)
> However korundum is ruby-language submodule.
>
> To keep movie-gem compatibility i vote
>
> moonstone
>
> Learn more
> http://www.gemhut.com/gemidx.htm
>
> Regards,
> Aivils
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxconsole-dev mailing list
> Lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxconsole-dev
>