Re: Is linuxconsole.sf.net untouchable?

[James S. <jsi...@ww...>]

> 	Are You aware linuxconsole.sf.net front page is partialy
> obsolete? You was total careless , bot now You show some
> activity.

Fbdev is coming along so its time to work on the console system again.
Also I want to tye it all together. There is some really big changes going 
on in the X world which I like us to get invloved in.

> 	It would be nice if You rewrite "New Features"
> - multiple current tty.
> - each current tty can be assigned with console output
> device and input device (keyboard).
> - special console output device "frame buffer console"
> may be assigned with number of current tty's, where number
> is count of registered framebuffer devices.
> - each console device may be assigned with nuber of
> keyboards.
> - one keyboard conjugate with one console device. One
> keyboard link to multiple consoles is _not_ permited.
> - keyboard - console device link is runtime configurable.
> - each console device assigned with bootime configurable
> count ouf tty's.
> - under X suitable is number of dummy consoles, each
> X can use independ keyboard, which is assigned with
> headless dummy console.

The web site needs to be really improved over all. Any artist here ?


> 	In my opinition ruby CVS looks like waste box. That 
> CVS does not have any internet link, excluded only Vojtech's
> tools like evtest.c jstest.c and so on. I vote moving ruby-2.6
> to separate CVS module like ruby.  sf.net have enough
> docs how to move whole tree. 
> ruby/linux - erase.
> ruby/xfree86 - add to fornt page
> - tuntico is linux input subsystem event translator to xfree
> events , current against XFree 3.3.6 . Suitable for all
> input devices as well. Support 6 axis and 12 buttons (or more).
> Code still remain unique. Verdict- maintain.
> ruby/utils - maintain
> ruby/web - seems useless, because it never goes to front.
> ruby/docs - ?
> ruby/app-pathces - ?

I agree. Ruby should be placed into a attic. We need a new branch with a 
new name i.e being a type of gem. Also people often got confused about the
name because there is a scripting language called ruby. Any suggesting 
what the gem name we should us?

> You are native english speaker against my so-so english, so
> web space recreating is easy task for You!

Yeap. We should also have other language pages as well. I know a few 
people from around the world are here.