|
From: Aivils S. <Aiv...@un...> - 2003-09-15 08:58:49
|
>i thought that dumbcon is mostly temporaly solution for >bruby, until things are fixed for fbcon and one could then use a real VT with >VC's in ruby(and later std linux). dummy is stable solution, because gonna smart :) Users (me to) like xf86. Users (me to) like GLX accelerated xf86. xf86 mostly initialize secondary video adapters pefect. Posible PPC users (none known) may start ruby right now with dummy console only. >but how are usefull more VC's on a dumbcon ? Seems VC's remain unused. >one can not switch VC's on a dumbcon, >or at least i don't see a point in doing so, >but i would realy like to try 4,5,6 Matrox MMS G200/G450 in a single system >which would mean 16-24 heads > >for a stand alone system this is probably impossible currently >i mean the system will crowl, but i think it shouldn't be a problem in running >that much users in case the ruby box is used as LTSP client. In my end 3 users which runs only (xchat,web chat,xmms)x3 may take 90% of CPU Athlon 1600+. Aivils Stoss |