From: Stian H. <sti...@it...> - 2003-03-12 11:55:34
|
Hi Svetljo, and thank you for you input! > > The patch from Miguel Freitas was removing all the framebuffer stuff, > i don't think so: > have you looked at the explanation about G450, > it's useing just FB's > http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/multiuser/g450.html > > i got this way a Matrox G550DH for 2 X users, > but useing plain FB X drivers means no accel, so ... Yes, we have tried this solution, but we have not been able to get this patch to work with other framebuffer drivers than Matrox (Matrox seems to be a very "nice" driver). The problem occurred when we needed support for more than one card/manufacturer (eg. Nvidia, ATI, Matrox, sis). Our main environment are 4 ATI cards with 8 output on each card ( A total of 32 outputs from one PC - each with its own mouse and keyboard ), and the solution from Miguel Freitas did not work in our environment. > > If you know of any other way to do this (in a better way), please send > > me a note! > > i think the way Miguel used for the PCI resource managment was better, > and i don't know a better way. This method( the one from Miguel ) was found by > some NetBSD users, and is used by backstreet ruby: http://startx.times.lv/ I will look into this once again, but I know we had some problems with only one X-session showing at the time (and the rest went blank or "sleeping") when we used the patch from Freitas. We have also tried the backstreet ruby solution, but this was not supporting the kernel version that we needed at the time when we tried it. Maybe it will work now ? (Kernel 2.4.21-pre5 or later) WBR Stian Hartviksen |