Re: What I should do for official ruby backport?

[James S. <jsi...@in...>]

> I am not sure what your patch exactly does. But if it's a full ruby
> back-port, I am not sure it is really worth the pain (IMHO). As far as I
> know, ruby is not going to make it into 2.4. It must be quite hard and
> time-comsuming to track the console+input thing, isn't it ?
> Are there many users out there *needing* ruby in 2.4 ? If it's only for
> testing purposes, I guess they can use 2.5.

I agree. That is way I never worked on a 2.4 port. There are just to
many changes to severly subsystem layers to deal with.