From: Petr B. <pa...@pa...> - 2002-09-07 08:21:32
|
Dear diary, on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:12:27PM CEST, I got a letter, where Petr Vandrovec <VAN...@vc...> told me, that... > > desktop. We will have 16 instead of 64. The second change which I don't > > I'm already using 25 virtual terminals on one head (*). 64 is low, but > 16 is unusable. I could imagine changing code to allow for unlimited > number of virtual terminals per one desktop, but going down to 16? > Petr Vandrovec > van...@vc... > > (*) ctrl-leftalt-f1..f12, ctrl-rightalt-f1..f12, plus alt-leftarrow > from VT1 to reach fullscreen VMware... Some of VT's display progress > of different processes (teletext grabber, rc5des, syslog, ...), > and rest of them I use for real work. I already ran out of 24 VTs > few times in the past, but it never bothered me enough to learn kernel > about windows-f1..f12 being vt25..36. Agreed - I also use 24 or 36 virtual terminals on one head regularily.. it would be really bad if the limit would be lowered to such a unusable number like 16 :-(. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis * ELinks maintainer * IPv6 guy (XS26 co-coordinator) * IRCnet operator * FreeCiv AI occassional hacker . <Beeth> Girls are like internet domain names, the ones I like are already taken. <honx> Well, you can still get one from a strange country :-P . Public PGP key && geekcode && homepage: http://pasky.ji.cz/~pasky/ |