From: Vojtech P. <vo...@su...> - 2002-07-31 10:11:26
|
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:07:21AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > vo...@su... said: > > Ok. Is the use in drivers/input/serio.c buggy? > > If it matters that the thread can miss wakeup events and sleep indefinitely > while there's a 'SERIO_RESCAN' event pending, then yes it looks buggy. > > serio_thread() serio_rescan() > -------------- -------------- > > serio_handle_events(); > serio->event |= SERIO_RESCAN; > wake_up(&serio_wait); > sleep_on(&serio_wait); > > ...sleeps... > > If both serio_thread() and serio_rescan() hold the BKL you're OK. It looks > like serio_rescan() doesn't, though. Thanks for the explanation. Yes, this could happen. > > What should be it replaced with? > > In general, the response 'anything but sleep_on' is considered appropriate. > Try wait_event(). -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs |