From: Alexander V. <vi...@ma...> - 2002-07-30 22:05:57
|
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > ICBW, but wasn't uint<n>_t only promised to be at least <n> bits? As the matter of fact, IHBW. > > I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make. |