Re: [patch] Input cleanups for 2.5.29 [2/2]

[Brad H. <bh...@bi...>]

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 07:42, Alexander Viro wrote:
<snip>
> Strictly speaking, there might be a DISadvantage - IIRC, there's nothing to
> stop gcc from
> #define uint8_t unsigned long long	/* it is at least 8 bits */
Here is an extract from <linux/types.h>
typedef         __u8            uint8_t;
typedef         __u16           uint16_t;

> ICBW, but wasn't uint<n>_t only promised to be at least <n> bits?
I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make.

Brad
-- 
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.