From: Johann D. <joh...@la...> - 2002-07-28 11:30:36
|
Brad Hards wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 18:22, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > [...] > >>__u* is used extensively in the input API anyway, so you'd have to >>explain it to userspace programmers nevertheless. So I prefer keeping >>the input.h include use just one type of explicit sized types. > > So do I, and it had better be a standard type. > > Note that the input API does *NOT* use __u* extensively. In fact > if you take out the force feedback stuff (which Johannes already (Just a detail: my name is Johann) > agreed to change:), this is the *only* _u* usage in any part of the > input API. > I did this change in the past, but it was undone (not by me), as it would break user-space applications. I definitely agree to use uint16_t. > >>Sure, we can change them all to uint*_t, but then do it all at once and >>provide a satisfactory explanation for it. ;) > > I am doing it all. Johannes agreed to the change, and I did the only > other required entry. If Johannes agrees, I'll do the trivial changes > for force-feedback. Ok with me. > The reason why I am not doing it all at once is to provide patches > that do one API change at a time. Or, depending on how you look > at it, I did the only change all-at-once, and you reverted it :) > > Brad > -- Johann Deneux |