From: Brad H. <bh...@bi...> - 2002-07-28 07:37:31
|
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 01:08, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 12:47:20AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > No problem. Send me a patch that does it for both the EVIOSGABS and > EVIOCSABS and I'll take it. You can either just do it in evdev.c, or > change every driver to use the struct. I am just doing the evdev.c (ie the ABI) at this stage. I may look at the internal representation later. Patch against 2.5.29. Looks OK? > > I could live with curr, min and max instead of *_value, but it > > would be nicer if it was a bit more descriptive. > > You can make it current, minimum, and maximum, if you wish. I'm a > minimalist when it comes to naming, and I don't really think "_value" is > bringing much information here. All of them are values after all. "current" is a bad idea. I used curr_value. Also, it is nice if you can retain the attributions (so I can get some ego satisfaction, and so people know who to blame). This is generally done by maintainers - any chance you can do this too? Brad -- http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black. |