Re: iforce compilation fixes for 2.5.25

[Johann D. <joh...@la...>]

Brad Hards wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 19:10, Johann Deneux wrote:
> 
>>>>Those symbols were both used as "enums" for bus types and as
>>>>configuration options. Now IFORCE_{232,USB} is used for the bus type
>>>>only, and CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_{232,USB}.
>>>>
>>>This sentence looks incomplete - I'm not following it.
>>>
>>It is indeed incomplete. The missing part is "for
>>configuration-dependent code".
>>
> So you used a construct like:
> 
>         case IFORCE_USB:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_USB
>                 iforce->cr.bRequest = packet[0];
> <random snippage>
> #else
>                 printk(KERN_ERR "iforce_get_id_packet: iforce->bus = USB!\n");
> #endif
>                 break;
> 
> 
> 

Yep
-- 
Johann