From: Vojtech P. <vo...@su...> - 2002-04-22 15:10:40
|
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:40:25PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:26, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:19:29PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:22, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > EVIOCGBUS? What's that? > > > > > > Beats me: > > > $ grep EVIOCGBUS include/linux/input.h > > > #define EVIOCGBUS _IOR('E', 0x07, short[4]) > > > /* get bus address */ > > > > Humm, don't have it in my current version, sorry. Latest version > > (without your patches still) attached. (Note the interface version isn't > > changed yet in it, but that's a mistake). > I'm looking at the 2.4.19-pre7 from Marcelo, which is what I guess most > developers are working on. The version in 2.4.19-pre7 is > > $Id: input.h,v 1.34 2001/05/28 09:06:44 vojtech Exp $ > > There are a lot of changes to the version in 2.4.19-pre7. Are you feeding > changes to just CVS, CVS and 2.5 or CVS, 2.4 and 2.5? Is there plans to run a > backport later, or is 2.4 going to stagnate? The plan is to do a partial backport later, right now the most recent stuff is in the CVS, being fed into 2.5 from CVS gradually. > I am just bringing up a box that I can afford to run a risky kernel on (like > 2.5.X-preY :), so I will soon be able to play with various combos of 2.4, 2.5 > and 2.5+CVS. > > I can maybe do some patches for the input system for 2.4 if you just need > grunt work. It would be nice, if you could. I'm rather low on time right now (should be better after a couple weeks), because of other projects (robotic cup, wedding, ...). -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs |