Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Fbdev Bitkeeper repository

[Larry M. <lm...@bi...>]

> Please tell us that primary framebuffer/input/console development will
> continue in the CVS drop-in tree on SourceForge?  Bitkeeper is unable to
> support this (easier, more efficient) style of development.

Could you please explain why you think CVS is easier and more efficient?
Last I checked, BK was a superset of CVS, but could be used pretty much
identically to CVS if that's what you want.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm