From: Vojtech P. <vo...@su...> - 2001-12-02 22:15:11
|
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 10:34:04PM +0100, Lorenzo Delana wrote: > > I think tuntitko uses the same license as XFree86, so that it could be > > merged in later. 0rfelyus should know. > > right I understand now, clearly all the things near to XFree86 should to be > licensed under XFree86 license so the merge with it is possible. So I'm > accordly to use an XFree license. > > Ley me undertand... XFree86 license cannot merge with GPL parts in any case ? Honestly, I'm not sure now. I think they could be compatible, but I don't remember the XFree86 license exactly. Anyway, you can't add GPL'd code to XFree86 without imposing GPL restrictions on XFree86 as a whole. > So LinuxConsole are divided in two parts: > - kernel ( GPL code ) > - xfree ( XFree86 code ) > > Are y accordly if I provide to the project the tintitko-40.c source code that > remains todo ? I am working on it and I hope to finish in few days... > In code writing I make sharing of all possible things with > tintitko-{common,devconfig}... Yes, that'd be wonderful. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs |