From: Petr V. <VAN...@vc...> - 2001-11-14 18:04:00
|
On 14 Nov 01 at 9:57, James Simmons wrote: > > I think that it is much easier to create an > > > > In such case you have much better control over specified options > > command line, you can parse some options in special way, you can > > specify fbdev own defaults for fb_info fields, ... And you do not > > have to change API. But I think that you all know my position very well. > > This is pretty close to what we have in CVS. Of course doing it this way > means every framebuffer driver needs its own setup function. It needs it anyway, AFAIK. Or is there some fbdev driver which is completely PnP? Maybe sbus* driver family, and for them you can create fb_default_setup(), which will just retry calls to parse general parameter for every strsep() result. In such case we have small default setup for PnP framebuffers, and still complicated/unconfigurable framebuffers can complain on specified unsupported arguments, or accept its own parameters. Petr Vandrovec van...@vc... |