Re: CVS Tags

[M. R. B. <mr...@0x...>]

* James Simmons <jsi...@tr...> on Wed, Nov 14, 2001:

>=20
> So this is the method people want. Actually all the tags I done where done
> right after I synced and tested the tree.
>=20

Well, this is the method Paul turned me onto.  I used to do it they way you
were before he showed me why tagging *before* the sync made more sense than
tagging after it.  If this goes against your policy, then we can do it the
other way...

It just makes more sense this way since when you pull a version by tag, you
not only get exactly what it was when you synced to that version, you also
get any local changes that may or may not have been sent back to Linus (or
whomever - if it's a drop-in against a drop-in :P).

Does this sound good to you?

M. R.