From: James S. <jsi...@tr...> - 2001-06-25 22:23:39
|
> Incidentally, I wrote this before noticing the write call inside the > cvs version of evdev.c; however, I still use it for two reasons: > > (1) evdev.c's write call is broken. Broken !! How? > (2) this registers its own input device, rather than piggybacking on > something else. For my uses, this is a requirement. > > The primary manner in which it differs is that it accepts not a full > struct input_event, but rather a similar structure but without the > timeval at the front. I'm still not quite sure whether this was a > correct decision or not, and if someone wants to include this in the > main distribution after (and only after) the change is made, I'll > consider it. Okay. I will give it a try. |