From: Franz S. <Fra...@la...> - 2001-06-19 21:37:49
|
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 23:15, James Simmons wrote: > > I meant a more unified solution as it applied to the input code. > > Okay. Misunderstood you. > > > The patch is simply to clean up some of the input code and to avoid code > > duplication and a few potential oopses from occasionally dereferencing a > > NULL pointer. > > Is this a seperate patch or the patch from Charles? I looked at his patch > and it has only one line change in input.c. Very nice patch. After I'm > done with power management today I will incorporate it. Probable some > time tomorrow unless Vojtech has any objections. Last time I asked Vojtech wasn't very pleased of that idea, eg. it doesn't make much sense to mix in EV_ABS devices. Maybe it should be a separate module providing a whole class of event mix devices, with all EV_KEY and EV_REL mixed on /dev/eventmix0 by default. Then there could be ioctl's to attach and detach single event devices onto the mixer devices. Franz. |