Re: [SYNC] synced with 2.4.5

[Johann D. <jo...@Do...>]

Hi!

If the cvs tree now compiles well, we should tag it. I think we agreed on
that on previous mails. The point was to avoid the compilation problems we
had with 2.4.4.
Tagging this correct version would allow people to use it if we run into
trouble trying to sync the cvs tree with 2.4.6, once it's out.

-- 
Johann Deneux
CS student at DoCS (www.docs.uu.se/~johannd) and
ESIL (www.esil.univ-mrs.fr/~jdeneux)