From: James S. <jsi...@li...> - 2001-03-15 04:46:02
|
>>So the fbdev drivers would register PM with fbcon, not PCI, correct? > >Either that, or the fbdev would register with PCI (or whatever), _and_ >fbcon would too independently. In that scenario, fbcon would only handle >things like disabling the cursor timer, while fbdev's would handle HW >issues. THe only problem is for fbcon to know that a given fbdev is >asleep, this could be an exported per-fbdev flag, an error code, or >whatever. In this case, fbcon can either buffer text input, or fallback >to the cfb working on the backed up fb image (that last thing can be >handled entirely within the fbdev I guess). Hi! I had to give it some thought. I like to see this handles inside the fbdev driver itself instead of inside fbcon. For 2.5.X it will be possible to use /dev/fb with vgacon. Even better yet it will be possible to use just a serial console and not use a VT but still use /dev/fb. So we will want to to have fbdev doing power management itself. As for handling the cursors I recently purposed a standardize cursor api so X can use it as well via userland and a standard fbcon_cursor can be written. With this api it would be easy to handle suspending and restoring the cursor for fbcon for /dev/fb. As for fbcon knowing when it is asleep. Hum. We could have a flags to tell it to have text data updates to be placed in the shadow buffer (struct vc_datas->vc_screenbuffer) only; MS: (n) 1. A debilitating and surprisingly widespread affliction that renders the sufferer barely able to perform the simplest task. 2. A disease. James Simmons [jsi...@li...] ____/| fbdev/console/gfx developer \ o.O| http://www.linux-fbdev.org =(_)= http://linuxgfx.sourceforge.net U http://linuxconsole.sourceforge.net |