From: Jean-Daniel P. <jd...@di...> - 2006-07-23 20:56:17
|
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 07:04:35PM +0200, ludovic pollet wrote: > I'd really like to know if you have XV working on all you heads with ni= ce=20 > cpu usage... playing the very same video sample (divx, but does it matter ?) 25 fps on= =20 both my card gives almost the same result. both are using xv, mplayer said : =AB VO: [xv] 720x576 =3D> 768x576 Planar YV12 =BB GeForce4 Ti 4200 (AGP 4x): real 2m11.211s user 0m13.145s sys 0m0.344s GeForce4 MX 440 (plain old PCI) real 2m9.529s user 0m18.829s sys 0m0.636s lurking around with ps or top gives 8% 9% max for mplayer on both cards,=20 but most of the time it's around 5% Still, I think measuring with "time" is more precise. using full screen by resizing the video to 1280x1024 doesn't gives much difference : GeForce4 Ti 4200 (AGP 4x): real 0m26.300s user 0m3.480s sys 0m0.240s GeForce4 MX 440 (plain old PCI) real 0m26.960s user 0m3.000s sys 0m0.880s =09 Now if I play fgfs, one is really much slower than the other... -- Jean-Daniel Pauget - http://nekodune.com/ T=E9l: +33 (0)2 33 17 20 16 2, rue Andr=E9 PELCA 50580 Denneville-Plage France |