Dear diary, on Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:12:27PM CEST, I got a letter,
where Petr Vandrovec <VAN...@vc...> told me, that...
> > desktop. We will have 16 instead of 64. The second change which I don't
>
> I'm already using 25 virtual terminals on one head (*). 64 is low, but
> 16 is unusable. I could imagine changing code to allow for unlimited
> number of virtual terminals per one desktop, but going down to 16?
> Petr Vandrovec
> van...@vc...
>
> (*) ctrl-leftalt-f1..f12, ctrl-rightalt-f1..f12, plus alt-leftarrow
> from VT1 to reach fullscreen VMware... Some of VT's display progress
> of different processes (teletext grabber, rc5des, syslog, ...),
> and rest of them I use for real work. I already ran out of 24 VTs
> few times in the past, but it never bothered me enough to learn kernel
> about windows-f1..f12 being vt25..36.
Agreed - I also use 24 or 36 virtual terminals on one head regularily.. it
would be really bad if the limit would be lowered to such a unusable number
like 16 :-(.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
* ELinks maintainer * IPv6 guy (XS26 co-coordinator)
* IRCnet operator * FreeCiv AI occassional hacker
.
<Beeth> Girls are like internet domain names, the ones I like are already taken.
<honx> Well, you can still get one from a strange country :-P
.
Public PGP key && geekcode && homepage: http://pasky.ji.cz/~pasky/
|