Re: [lc-devel] Re: [Openmosix-devel] oM + cc doesn't mixw

[Moshe B. <mo...@mo...>]

yes, that makes more sense. Porting it to openMosix should be pretty 
straight forward.

Moshe


On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 04:06 Europe/Rome, Bob Arctor wrote:

> what about using only compressed swap feature? this souldn't be so 
> hard to
> port and not much cpu-consuming.
>
> On Thursday 22 May 2003 10:31, Moshe Bar wrote:
>> :-) no, the two things won't mix easily.  there's a lot of work
>>
>> invovled in making this work.
>>
>> you have to maintain the cached object structure if you pass them 
>> among
>> nodes, so you will end up doing lots of compress/decompress which will
>> eat up a lot of CPU. Not sure if it makes sense at all.
>>
>> Moshe
>>
>> On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 07:42 Europe/Rome, Bob Arctor wrote:
>>> i tried to mix compressed cache with oM, and no, this is not working 
>>> :(
>>> i compiled it non-SMP.
>>> it boots, but it panicks @ startx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
>>> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
>>> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
>>> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openmosix-devel mailing list
>>> Ope...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
>> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
>> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
>> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
>> _______________________________________________
>> linuxcompressed-devel mailing list
>> lin...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxcompressed-devel
>
> -- 
> -- 
>