Re: [lc-devel] Re: [Openmosix-devel] oM + cc doesn't mixw

[Bob A. <cu...@pb...>]

what about using only compressed swap feature? this souldn't be so hard to 
port and not much cpu-consuming.

On Thursday 22 May 2003 10:31, Moshe Bar wrote:
> :-) no, the two things won't mix easily.  there's a lot of work
>
> invovled in making this work.
>
> you have to maintain the cached object structure if you pass them among
> nodes, so you will end up doing lots of compress/decompress which will
> eat up a lot of CPU. Not sure if it makes sense at all.
>
> Moshe
>
> On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 07:42 Europe/Rome, Bob Arctor wrote:
> > i tried to mix compressed cache with oM, and no, this is not working :(
> > i compiled it non-SMP.
> > it boots, but it panicks @ startx
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openmosix-devel mailing list
> > Ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openmosix-devel
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> linuxcompressed-devel mailing list
> lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxcompressed-devel

-- 
--