Re: [lc-devel] 0.23pre2
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
nitin_sf
From: Rodrigo S. de C. <rc...@im...> - 2002-04-29 22:28:43
|
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 11:38:50PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > kernel: EIP: 0010:[find_comp_page+24/104] Tainted: P (...) > kernel: Call Trace: [flush_comp_cache+43/164] [do_swap_page+338/384] > [handle_mm_fault+112/240] [do_page_faul > t+388/1204] [do_page_fault+0/1204] > kernel: [timer_bh+46/680] [bh_action+38/116] [tasklet_hi_action+93/128] > [do_softirq+97/200] [do_IRQ+214/2 > 32] [error_code+52/64] Two liner fix already in my pool. Thanks for the report. > AND ALSO MASSIVE!!!! and i mean MASSIVE failures like this: > > kernel: init_special_inode: bogus imode (0) > EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,10)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #2063: > rec_len %% 4 != 0 - o > ffset=0, inode=0, rec_len=25, name_len=0 > > ALOT for every second!!! :-(( ... i will downgrade to 0.23pre1 or even > 0.22final. I have some ext3-fs errors with 0.23pre1 too but i forgot to > report it to you Rodrigo :( I had some troubles with the page cache support in the tests I ran in the morning too. So don't worry about reporting the ext3 errors given that they will report some corrupted stuff (like the bad entry in the directory) that it's unlikely to be much useful to find out what are actually the causes. These errors are reproducible, aren't they? Is there anything you usually do to reproduce them? Thanks. Regards, -- Rodrigo S. de Castro <rc...@im...> |