Re: [lc-devel] 0.23pre1 2.4.18 feeling good

[David C. <dav...@sh...>]

Too early to say stable. A bug just discovered

output from kdb

kmem_cache_grow+0x1ca
kemm_cache_alloc+0x1ab


Opps in kmem_cache_grow() somewhere, this is caused by kjournald as I am 
runing rh72 with ext3 filesystem. It happens at start up after I append 
mem=128M to limit my machine only to use 128M RAM, if I use 256M it does 
not happen. Please aware, I am running 2.4.18 with 0.23pre1.

regards,

David

Rodrigo Souza de Castro wrote:

>On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:11:15PM +0800, David Chow wrote:
>
>>It seems after using 0.23pre1, I don't have the problem with
>>compressed cache as before (0.21 with 2.4.17), I will try to merge
>>0.22 code in my production kernel with some change in 0.23 and
>>available for my users to test with.
>>
>
>Very nice to hear that. :-)
>
>>Whats the major bug fixes between those? I would like to
>>know.. Thanks.
>>
>
>There are many fixes for buglets from old versions which could, even
>being a buglet, still lock up your machine. Perhaps those fixes might
>have solved some issues you noticed in the 0.21 version.
>
>By the way, if you notice any bug, please report, otherwise I can't
>try to fix it.
>
>Best regards,
>