Re: [lc-devel] Let's get back to work!

[David C. <dav...@rc...>]

On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 03:40, Rodrigo Souza de Castro wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Finally all my graduate courses for my master degree are over. I
> enrolled in many courses this semester and from the middle of the
> semester, I had the need to spend almost all my time on assignments,
> seminars and exams. That's why this list has been so quiet for the
> last two months.
> 
> Anyway, from now on I will work full time on the Compressed Cache
> project. I think that we will be able to have a greater development
> and to get much better results from the project.
> 
> You all know that Linux 2.5 has been opened. Then we can expect minor
> changes from 2.4.x version that is being maintained by Marcelo
> Tosatti, nothing like what happened until 2.4.1X, when VM changed, for
> example. BTW, I talked to him today about whether either I should port
> the current code to 2.5.x and follow this branch or follow 2.4.x. I
> agree with Marcelo that 2.4.x has a bigger userbase and I think that
> we should follow this version. Once in a while I will port to 2.5 and
> make a patch available on the project page to keep track of the
> changes being done in this kernel version. Thus, my first activity
> will be to port to 2.4.16, (or 2.4.17 if Marcelo releases a new
> version until there). Comments about this decision are very welcome.
> 
> Well, let's get back to work. If somebody feels like helping me doing
> something, please let me know.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Rodrigo S. de Castro <rc...@im...>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linuxcompressed-devel mailing list
> lin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxcompressed-devel

I agree staying in 2.4 since from 2.4.16, the vm and other changes seems
to be more stable. I am also studying the change of the vm during 2.4.1x
. I will keep track with you. Thanks.

regards,

David Chow