Re: [lc-devel] [linux-mm-cc] Announce: ccache release 0.1
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
nitin_sf
From: Nitin G. <nit...@gm...> - 2008-02-19 16:46:57
|
On Feb 19, 2008 9:46 PM, John McCabe-Dansted <gm...@gm...> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2008 6:39 AM, Nitin Gupta <nit...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am excited to announce first release of ccache - Compressed RAM > > based swap device for Linux (2.6.x kernel). > > - Project home: http://code.google.com/p/ccache/ > > - ccache-0.1: http://ccache.googlecode.com/files/ccache-0.1.tar.bz2 > > I find it counter intuitive that ccache-0.1 is newer than ccache-2.4: > http://ccache.samba.org/ > > Perhaps you should rename this, perhaps to ccacheM (module). > My bad. I knew there is going to be confusion with http://ccache.samba.org/ which has _nothing_ to do with this project. I am now going to rename this project to "compcache" to avoid any confusion. New project home will be: http://code.google.com/p/compcache/ It will take few days for this transition to complete. > FYI, ccache still seems solid under Hardy. > A 128MB ccache swap allowed me to easily install from the liveCD on a > VM with only 192MB of ram, rather than the 384MB officially required > for Gutsy. > However I found a funny bug in ubiquity: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193267 > http://www.ucc.asn.au/~mccabedj/ccache/Screenshot-Hardy-fdccache.png > Installing Hardy to /dev/ccache sound like a great idea ;) Yeah. Interesting :) - /dev/ccache really should not be visible there since its _not_ possible to install on this device! This is not a _generic_ block device and can be used only as a swap disk. However, I am not sure how to make it invisible to installer (maybe load module after partitioning step is over?). > > I am using a DualCore, with the iso sitting on the harddisk, so a real > low-mem machine could be a lot slower. however Ubuntu is meant to > require 384MB of memory to install and 256MB of memory to use. It > seems that by adding ccache to the liveCD we could just state a single > figure of 256MB (which is 64MB less than 256MB, so we are giving > ourselves plenty of breathing space for RAM stealing video cards, > unexpected usage spikes etc.) > > > -- > John C. McCabe-Dansted > PhD Student > University of Western Australia > |