Re: [Linuxcoe-devel] Update on packaging

[Bruno C. <Bru...@hp...>]

Bryan Gartner said on Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 03:46:55PM -0700:

> > What about adding  anoption to configure (for packager, which means me
> > atm) allowing for bypassing those checks ? That would of course not be
> > on by default.
> > 
> > Would that work for you ?
> 
> Those kinds of checks are already there, IIRC (./configure --help)
> 
>   --without-APACHE        skip auto-integratation with Apache webserver
>   --without-SUDOERS       skip auto-integration with sudo

Well that's different if I read them correctly.
I want the integration. What I don't want is the check that apache
exists.

With the integration activated it will make a symlink to LInuxCOE.conf
httpd file correctly, anf thus when I install the package on a machine
with an apache server (which is a requirement of my package) it just
works. sudo is indeed less a problem as it's nearly mandatory in distro
nowadays.

If I remove the integration, I'll have to add it myself and won't be
abelt to use the post-action script. Which is of course another
possibility.

Bruno.
-- 
Linux Profession Lead EMEA  / Open Source Evangelist \        HP C&I EMEA IET
http://www.mondorescue.org / HP/Intel Solution Center \  http://hpintelco.net
Des infos sur Linux?  http://www.HyPer-Linux.org      http://www.hp.com/linux
La musique ancienne?  http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org