From: Bruno C. <Bru...@hp...> - 2007-10-17 23:42:42
|
Hello, Bryan Gartner said on Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:01:06AM -0600: > Sorry for my proposal/diversion, I have recrafted the following modules to > use the previous namespace: > > linuxcoe-sd-base > linuxcoe-sd-docs Oh, great ! so now my system works directly, and I do not have any warning/error message anymore: # urpmi /usr/src/svn/LinuxCOE/build/RPMS/noarch/linuxcoe-sd-docs-devel-1.mdv2008.0.noarch.rpm /usr/src/svn/LinuxCOE/build/RPMS/noarch/linuxcoe-sd-base-devel-1.mdv2008.0.noarch.rpm installing linuxcoe-sd-base-devel-1.mdv2008.0.noarch.rpm linuxcoe-sd-docs-devel-1.mdv2008.0.noarch.rpm from /usr/src/svn/LinuxCOE/build/RPMS/noarch Preparing... ################################################################################# 1/2: linuxcoe-sd-base ################################################################################# Reloading httpd: [ OK ] 2/2: linuxcoe-sd-docs ################################################################################# I'm already happy with that ;-) More tests tomorrow to see if it really works. (I need to configure the apache server now). The remaining question I have is for the name of the directories. Currently by default they are named /var/log/linuxcoe-sd-base, ... /var/www/linuxcoe-sd-base. I wonder whether it would be cleaner to call those just /var/www/linuxcoe-sd (or even /var/www/linuxcoe) for more clarity on the admin side, and as all packages will add content below. May be solved later on BTW. > linuxcoe-sd-data-centos > (and note that this module no longer delivers images) I just looked today at the fedora one to see what was needed and what had to be generated. If you want I can take a closer look at that based on the existing script for ideas, and write a perl script that creates what is required for LinuxCOE based on a mirrored centos setup. > and have updated the packaging/<module>/debian artifacts to correctly > package them as .debs. I will work through the remaining modules > this week. After this round of modifications, I will modify: > > linuxcoe-sd-data-* > name stds, skip image delivery > linuxcoe-sd-* > pull back version number in delivered directory hierarchy > linuxcoe-sd-*.deb > migrate to .deb via PB On that one, if you want, I can copy your current content under pbconf, make the adaptations, and you could then test it, once you have a working pb on your side ;-) I'm still not done with all my rpm VMs setup, so have not yet a .deb for pb itself. Will come soon I hope. Bruno. -- Linux Profession Lead EMEA / Open Source Evangelist \ HP C&I EMEA IET http://www.mondorescue.org / HP/Intel Solution Center \ http://hpintelco.net Des infos sur Linux? http://www.HyPer-Linux.org http://www.hp.com/linux La musique ancienne? http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org |