Re: [Linuxcoe-devel] Update on packaging

[Bryan G. <Bry...@HP...>]

Louis,

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:06:08AM +0000, Bouchard, Louis wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I don't know why we're going through another iteration of the naming
> convention used.  We should discuss it at today's core meeting but my
> (rough) feeling is that LinuxCOE needs something else than just another
> naming convention.

Sorry for my proposal/diversion, I have recrafted the following modules to
use the previous namespace:

	linuxcoe-sd-base
	linuxcoe-sd-docs
	linuxcoe-sd-data-centos
	    (and note that this module no longer delivers images)

and have updated the packaging/<module>/debian artifacts to correctly
package them as .debs.  I will work through the remaining modules
this week.  After this round of modifications, I will modify:

	linuxcoe-sd-data-*
	    name stds, skip image delivery
        linuxcoe-sd-*
	    pull back version number in delivered directory hierarchy
        linuxcoe-sd-*.deb
	    migrate to .deb via PB

bryang