Re: [Linuxcoe-devel] Update on packaging

[Bryan G. <Bry...@HP...>]

Bruno,

On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 05:16:52PM +0000, Cornec, Bruno (Linux Consultant) wrote:
> Hello again,
> 
> Other remarks:
> 
> 1/ When attempting to remove my package (for tests) it says:
> 
> sudo-specific removal tasks
>   should un-augment /etc/sudoers, but not implemented yet ...
>   please look for ^apache /etc/sudoers entries to remove ... sorry
> 
> Why would prevent using the following:
> 
> perl -pi -e 's/^apache.*//' /etc/sudoers

Other than being a bit too general (and assuming you meant ^${httpd_user}),
I think it's fine to walk the entries we put in and remove them.  I'll
see if I can something like that implemented today.

> I put it in the spec file, and it seems to work fine.
> (except it doesn't remove the comments ;-)
> 
> 
> 2/ I have a misunderstanding on naming convention:
> 
> I thought we agreed on packages named systemdesigner and
> systemdesigner-docs (for the 2 first I'm dealing with now).

Nope, we had revisited the scheme some months ago (which is
why the 4.1 changes this).

> However in the code it seems to be linuxcoe-sysdes and
> linuxcoe-sysdes-docs.

This was "closer" but still doesn't match the "standard" we
had talked about.  I'll reply to the follow-on message with
some proposed changes.

> Did I forget something ? Coudl someone indicate which one is the right
> one please.
> 
> Also for additional Distro support what about
> [systemdesigner|linuxcoe-sysdes]-[addon|plgin]-distroname
> 
> e.g.: linuxcoe-sysdes-plugin-fedora or linuxcoe-sysdes-addon-fedora.

See follow-up.

> WDYT ?
> 
> 
> Also, it appears there is an issue with CVS. When I do a commit, and
> ask for a cvs up on another machine, it doesn't come up immediately.
> I have to wait a couple of minutes for it to be available. I'm used to SVN
> rather which is immediate. Is it a known limitation ?

Yes, since SF.net mirrors CVS from developer space to anonymous access.

bryang