Re: [Linuxcoe-devel] Update on packaging

[Bruno C. <Bru...@hp...>]

Bruno Cornec said on Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 05:56:43PM +0200:

> >From a quick look at the sources of today, I remarked that:
> 
> ./docs/configure.ac:AC_INIT([linuxcoe-sysdes-docs],[4.1],[bry...@hp...])
> ./SystemDesigner/configure.ac:AC_INIT([linuxcoe-sysdes],[4.1],[bry...@hp...])


Looking back at the thread with Louis this morning, I'm looking where
the truth is (if we can find any ;-)

Should we use for packages:

linuxcoe-sd-base and linuxcoe-sd-docs (I now use this one) or
linuxcoe-sysdes and linuxcoe-sysdes-docs

Then once this is answered, then what subdirectory name should we use:
/etc/systemdesigner or
/etc/linuxcoe-sysdes or
/etc/linuxcoe-sd-base or
/etc/linuxcoe-sd or
/etc/linuxcoe or
(insert your favorite here ;-)

I'll then derived as we need the same choice vor /var/log and /var/lib
(What I won't do the make another subdir below with the verion name as
fr packages this is useless because you can't have multiple instances)

Bruno.
-- 
Linux Profession Lead EMEA  / Open Source Evangelist \        HP C&I EMEA IET
http://www.mondorescue.org / HP/Intel Solution Center \  http://hpintelco.net
Des infos sur Linux?  http://www.HyPer-Linux.org      http://www.hp.com/linux
La musique ancienne?  http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org