Re: [Linuxcoe-devel] Update on packaging

[Bruno C. <Bru...@hp...>]

Hello again,

Other remarks:

1/ When attempting to remove my package (for tests) it says:

sudo-specific removal tasks
  should un-augment /etc/sudoers, but not implemented yet ...
  please look for ^apache /etc/sudoers entries to remove ... sorry

Why would prevent using the following:

perl -pi -e 's/^apache.*//' /etc/sudoers 

I put it in the spec file, and it seems to work fine.
(except it doesn't remove the comments ;-)


2/ I have a misunderstanding on naming convention:

I thought we agreed on packages named systemdesigner and
systemdesigner-docs (for the 2 first I'm dealing with now).

However in the code it seems to be linuxcoe-sysdes and
linuxcoe-sysdes-docs. 
Did I forget something ? Coudl someone indicate which one is the right
one please.

Also for additional Distro support what about
[systemdesigner|linuxcoe-sysdes]-[addon|plgin]-distroname

e.g.: linuxcoe-sysdes-plugin-fedora or linuxcoe-sysdes-addon-fedora.

WDYT ?


Also, it appears there is an issue with CVS. When I do a commit, and
ask for a cvs up on another machine, it doesn't come up immediately.
I have to wait a couple of minutes for it to be available. I'm used to SVN
rather which is immediate. Is it a known limitation ?

Bruno.
-- 
Linux Profession Lead EMEA  / Open Source Evangelist \        HP C&I EMEA IET
http://www.mondorescue.org / HP/Intel Solution Center \  http://hpintelco.net
Des infos sur Linux?  http://www.HyPer-Linux.org      http://www.hp.com/linux
La musique ancienne?  http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org