Re: [Linux1394] libavc
Brought to you by:
aeb,
bencollins
From: Bruce M. <br...@tr...> - 2000-05-05 00:50:19
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Andreas Micklei wrote: all, I have the first version of libavc1394 ready. Where can I post it? Bruce. > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:23:00PM -0400, Bruce McDonald wrote: > > I'm new here so go easy. I am very interested in developing a dvcam tape > > scanning application that produces a batch capture list on output (at the > > very least). I am approaching this from the bottom-up so I am trying to > > abstract the AV/C & libraw funcations into a "libavc". I have noticed > > that gscanbus & and the sdpavc (from k-3d) both have their own api's (not > > in library form). I need to redo this existing overlap, so a library > > might be useful. > > I thought this to and actually I am planning to seperate the AV/C code from > gscanbus into a seperate library. However it would just be a libsimpleavc, so > just go ahead and build a "real" AV/C library if you need it. I would happily > adopt it for gscanbus and focus on something else. > > My simple AV/C implementation is quite handy for sending a command to a device > and receiving the response code. However I have not spent a single thought on > how to deal with input- / output-plugs and the whole issue of isochronous > stream management. This would probably be the hardest part of a real AV/C > implementation (and personally, I realy don't need that at the moment). > > > 0. Is the name, libavc, correct, or would libavc1394 (or other > > variant) be more correct? > > Both are correct. I would prefer libavc1394 because a beginner can than > easily figure out which parts belong to 1394. > > > 1. Would it be useful to develop a libavc which would implement the AV/C > > command set on top of libraw1394 in a standard way? > > Certainly. > > > (as an aside:- I tend to prefer C/asm for systems work and OO [c++/Java] > > languages for applications, so libavc would, most likely, be a C library) > > A C library would probably the best basis. A C++ / Java library on top of the > C library, or even better a CORBA binding would be nice to have later on. :-) > > Btw.: Can someone please put a gateway between the mailinglists at eclipt and > sourceforge, or shut down the list at eclipt completely? It is quite confusing > to have two seperate lists for the same subject. > > bye... > Andreas Micklei > |