Re: we need the iso write function (was RE: dvgrab)
Brought to you by:
aeb,
bencollins
From: Andreas B. <and...@mu...> - 2000-04-15 00:45:07
|
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 06:43:30PM +0200, Manfred Weihs wrote: > Well, I think there are many things, the linux world needs. Maybe it > would be nice to create a kind of wish list. Would be a good idea (together with information on who does/intends to work on specific items). > But I think, before such substantial additions are made (which of course > should come soon or later), it should have a higher priority to fix the > bugs in the existing fundamental operations. For example the lock > operation does not work, because we do not get the response value. > Therefore I cannot do a compare-swap-operation, because the return value > is essential for that kind of operation. And I need this :-( Oh, you mentioned that some time ago already. Sorry, I completely forgot that. I fixed that now, the necessary changes in libraw1394 were quite small, and the lock functions now take an additional quadlet_t* pointing to a location where the response is to be stored. I also fixed the kernel side raw1394 lock, where for remote transactions a pointer was not set (could get you a nasty oops). You can get both from CVS, apart from successful compilation I haven't tested it. -- Andreas E. Bombe <and...@mu...> DSA key 0x04880A44 http://home.pages.de/~andreas.bombe/ http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/ |