Re: Which ieee1394 boards do people actually own (intended for wearable computing application)?

[Dan D. <dde...@co...>]

I have been using exclusively the SIIG 1394 boards because they are
basically they same as the Pyro (typical TI-based design), but it's always a
few dollars cheaper. They are quite inexpensive at buy.com ($48); however, I
just checked their site again and the Pyro Basic DV is only $43 and in stock
Arne is in germany, and surely uses one that's more popular and available to
his market. These ADS and SIIG boards are "big enough name." It's the
chipset and manufacturing process that matters, but both of these as well as
many others use the venerable TI chips.
+-DRD-+
----- Original Message -----
From: "Felix Tang" <ta...@ee...>
To: <lin...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 5:50 PM
Subject: Which ieee1394 boards do people actually own (intended for wearable
computing application)?


> I'm interested in getting a ieee1394 board and interfacing to some dv
> cameras for wearable computing. What I want to know is which boards
> people actually own and develop with?
>
> I have looked at the archives and pcilynx and ohci are both mentioned. It
> seems that depending on what camp you're in, you can go with either. I'm
> guessing that OHCI seems to be a bit more popular according to some
> e-mails I read (i.e. windows 98 support).
>
> The pyro card from ADS was mentioned and given a relatively popular
> review. However, I'd like to hear of any cards that people have used that
> are a bit smaller and consume less power (without going pcmcia). Although,
> not a strict reqiurement... I'd rather have a big card that's better
> supported. ;)
>
> What card does Arne Schirmacher use to develop with (I use him as an
> example due to the fact that he wrote the application I'm interested in)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Felix
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list Lin...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/linux1394-user
>