Re: [Linux-wildo-devel] Other voice chat tools

[Gabriele D. C. <dar...@io...>]

About mumble: some of you tested it on the channel, the project is
promising for sure, they have something that we do not have, but look
like that we have something that they don't have.
But the development is very different is style, look like we are going
the Linux way (solid engine, GUI just atop of it) and they are going
the windows way (client and server are nearly the same thing), moreover
they are using many dependencies we choose to avoid in the past, sad we
have a so different design.. anyway i think we can benefit from looking
at each other code and maybe in the future we will get mutual benefit
from it.

About Squawk:
We had the author on the channel yesterday, he was quite silent, he
said that he dud not know about lw (sad cause we are easy to spot on SF
if you just put in "voice chat" in the search field).
He did not looked too interested about a cooperation (no proposition
from him and a statement that said that he do not know C++), but this
does not exclude anything for the future.

Regards,
Gabriele Dini Ciacci


On Sat, 24 Mar 2007
23:12:05 +0100 Steffen Pankratz <kr...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> i read you have some troubles at the moment (sound choppiness).
> Maybe one of this alternatives has a solution or can give you some
> new ideas. I have to admit that i did not test or had a closer look
> at one of them.
> 
> 1. http://mumble.sourceforge.net/
> 2. http://jdolan.dyndns.org/trac/wiki/Squawk
> 
> Good luck, Steffen.
> 


----------- 
http://linux-wildo.sf.net
http://www.diniciacci.org