Re: [Linux-vrf-general] question on linux vrf
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
|
From: Steffen M. <sm...@us...> - 2006-01-09 15:21:00
|
Hi, On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, =C0=CC=C1=A4=C8=A3 wrote: > Is it possible one interface can belong to several VR instances > like eth0 on VRF 0, 1, and 2? I only have experience with VRF 0.100 but I think it should be the same in= =20 all versions: No, I don't think it is possible to have one network device= =20 in multiple VRF instances. What would be the semantics of such a=20 configuration? I mean, the device and its VRF ID specify for each incoming= =20 frame by which VRF instance it should be processed. So if you would have=20 more than exactly one ID, which VRF instance should process the frame?=20 Maybe cloning the frame for each instance and thus having some kind of=20 multicast would be possible. I guess, it depends on what you are trying to= =20 achieve. Regards, Steffen. |