Re: [linux-vrf-core] "ip route show vrf X"
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2002-10-25 15:45:05
|
Hello, On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 08:31:33AM -0700, Robert May wrote: > > Hi James, > > One other behavior I observed is that periodically, my system seems to > freeze for 1-2 seconds. As far as I know, I am not executing anything to > initiate this behavior. > > Has anyone else encountered this ? You're the first one to report this bug :-) > Have you introduced any blocking calls into the kernel patch ? Not that I know, but I do modify some search code associated with TCP, UDP, and raw sockets. Were you running any aplications that would have been creating new sockets at these times? Now when you say 'periodically' how often? At regualr intervals? I'm wondering if there is some sort of TCP timer that is firing and executing a long search with a lock held. > When compiling my kernel, I have only enabled the following (other then > defaults): > * Networking Options -> Advanced Router -> Policy Routing > * Networking Options -> GRE tunneling support (loadable module) > * Network Device Support -> Approp. NIC support Just for for a sanity check: what NIC are you using, and have you run this same kernel version without VRF support? Thanks! > > Thanks, > -Robert. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lin...@li... > > [mailto:lin...@li...]On Behalf Of James R. > > Leu > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:52 AM > > To: Robert May > > Cc: lin...@li... > > Subject: Re: [linux-vrf-core] "ip route show vrf X" > > > > > > Thank you for your bug reports. The next release will contain the fixes. > > I expect to make the next release early next week. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:38:05AM -0700, Robert May wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > While testing the iproute2 patch, I discovered the following behavior: > > > > > > Giving command "ip route show vrf X" causes ip utility to > > display all routes > > > for all VRFs, regardless of vrf SELECTOR. In other words, it > > ignores the > > > selector. I think that if "vrf X" selector is not given, all > > routes should > > > be shown. If provided, it should only display the routes for that VRF. > > > > > > Attached patch provides the fix for this. It should be applied after > > > linux-vrf iproute2 patch. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > -Robert. > > > > > > > > -- > > James R. Leu > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-vrf-core mailing list > > lin...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-core > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en > _______________________________________________ > linux-vrf-core mailing list > lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-core -- James R. Leu |