linux-vrf-general Mailing List for Virtual Routing and Forwarding for Linux (Page 2)
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jleu
Menu
▾
▴
linux-vrf-general — List for discussion about Linux VRF
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(12) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Rich D. <ric...@ya...> - 2007-10-29 23:00:15
|
Hi James, No problem and big thanks. I am behind on open source work too. Thanks again for your work. Best Regards, Rich d --- "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > I got behind on my open source work. I plan to > devote one or > two evenings this week to gettin the VRF and > VRF+MPLS patches submitted > and build RPMs. > > I'll post to the list when I've finished. > > Sorry for the delays. > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:28:44AM -0700, Rich > DAddio wrote: > > Hi, > > Did this get get into the general tree or is it > available somewhere? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rich d > > > > "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > > I've managed to process your kernel patch, > tomorrow I will work on the > > iproute2 patch. > > > > I applied your patch minus the MPLS code to my > vrf-kernel tree. > > Tomorrow I will create a branch of this tree that > will contain your MPLS > > changes. This weekend I will try to build a FC5 > kernel RPM from the > > vrf-kernel tree and the vrf-mpls-kernel tree and > do some testing. > > Pending the results I'll make them available to > the general public > > via Source Forge. > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:19PM +0200, Jon > Ander wrote: > > > Hi James! > > > > > > As I promised last week, here you have mpls-vrf > and iproute2 patches. > > > > > > We have also designed a website where any of you > can find and test some > > > scenarios we have developed with vnuml. We will > continue making tests > > > related to QoS and updating the website. > > > > > > If you want to see our website, please visit > http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MPLS/ > > > > > > I'm looking forward to hear your comments. > > > -- > > > Saludos! > > > Jon Ander Pic? Pinto > > > NQaS group (University of the Basque Country) > > > > > > > > > > -- > > James R. Leu > > jl...@mi... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? > Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files > using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ > > Linux-vrf-general mailing list > > Lin...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? > Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files > using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > -- > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? > Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using > AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/> _______________________________________________ > Linux-vrf-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-10-29 15:57:29
|
I got behind on my open source work. I plan to devote one or two evenings this week to gettin the VRF and VRF+MPLS patches submitted and build RPMs. I'll post to the list when I've finished. Sorry for the delays. On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:28:44AM -0700, Rich DAddio wrote: > Hi, > Did this get get into the general tree or is it available somewhere? > =20 > Thanks, > =20 > Rich d >=20 > "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > I've managed to process your kernel patch, tomorrow I will work on the > iproute2 patch. >=20 > I applied your patch minus the MPLS code to my vrf-kernel tree. > Tomorrow I will create a branch of this tree that will contain your MPLS > changes. This weekend I will try to build a FC5 kernel RPM from the > vrf-kernel tree and the vrf-mpls-kernel tree and do some testing. > Pending the results I'll make them available to the general public > via Source Forge. >=20 > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:19PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > > Hi James! > >=20 > > As I promised last week, here you have mpls-vrf and iproute2 patches. > >=20 > > We have also designed a website where any of you can find and test some > > scenarios we have developed with vnuml. We will continue making tests > > related to QoS and updating the website. > >=20 > > If you want to see our website, please visit http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/= MPLS/ > >=20 > > I'm looking forward to hear your comments. > > --=20 > > Saludos! > > Jon Ander Pic? Pinto > > NQaS group (University of the Basque Country) >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/__________= _____________________________________ > Linux-vrf-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general >=20 >=20 > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20 > http://mail.yahoo.com=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Rich D. <ric...@ya...> - 2007-10-29 15:43:06
|
Hi Oscar, Great thanks!! Best Regards, Rich d --- Jose Oscar Fajardo <jtb...@ai...> wrote: > Hi Rich, > > I do not know if James has made any progress with > the testing, but meanwhile you can get the patches > from this URL: > http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MPLS/ (downloads section > -> patches) > > You can see there some examples as well. > > Regards, > Oscar > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Rich DAddio > To: jl...@mi... ; Jon Ander > Cc: mpl...@li... ; > lin...@li... > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:28 PM > Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] > [Linux-vrf-general] MPLS-VRF Patch under2.6.18.1 > > > Hi, > Did this get get into the general tree or is it > available somewhere? > > Thanks, > > Rich d > > "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: > I've managed to process your kernel patch, > tomorrow I will work on the > iproute2 patch. > > I applied your patch minus the MPLS code to my > vrf-kernel tree. > Tomorrow I will create a branch of this tree > that will contain your MPLS > changes. This weekend I will try to build a FC5 > kernel RPM from the > vrf-kernel tree and the vrf-mpls-kernel tree and > do some testing. > Pending the results I'll make them available to > the general public > via Source Forge. > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:19PM +0200, Jon > Ander wrote: > > Hi James! > > > > As I promised last week, here you have > mpls-vrf and iproute2 patches. > > > > We have also designed a website where any of > you can find and test some > > scenarios we have developed with vnuml. We > will continue making tests > > related to QoS and updating the website. > > > > If you want to see our website, please visit > http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MPLS/ > > > > I'm looking forward to hear your comments. > > -- > > Saludos! > > Jon Ander Pic? Pinto > > NQaS group (University of the Basque Country) > > > > > -- > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find > problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files > using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ > Linux-vrf-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? > Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files > using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? > Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using > AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/> _______________________________________________ > Linux-vrf-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Jose O. F. <jtb...@ai...> - 2007-10-29 15:08:20
|
Hi Rich, I do not know if James has made any progress with the testing, but = meanwhile you can get the patches from this URL: http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MPLS/ (downloads section -> patches) You can see there some examples as well. Regards, Oscar ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rich DAddio=20 To: jl...@mi... ; Jon Ander=20 Cc: mpl...@li... ; = lin...@li...=20 Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:28 PM Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] [Linux-vrf-general] MPLS-VRF Patch = under2.6.18.1 Hi, Did this get get into the general tree or is it available somewhere? Thanks, Rich d "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: I've managed to process your kernel patch, tomorrow I will work on = the iproute2 patch. I applied your patch minus the MPLS code to my vrf-kernel tree. Tomorrow I will create a branch of this tree that will contain your = MPLS changes. This weekend I will try to build a FC5 kernel RPM from the vrf-kernel tree and the vrf-mpls-kernel tree and do some testing. Pending the results I'll make them available to the general public via Source Forge. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:19PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi James! >=20 > As I promised last week, here you have mpls-vrf and iproute2 = patches. >=20 > We have also designed a website where any of you can find and test = some > scenarios we have developed with vnuml. We will continue making = tests > related to QoS and updating the website. >=20 > If you want to see our website, please visit = http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MPLS/ >=20 > I'm looking forward to hear your comments. > --=20 > Saludos! > Jon Ander Pic? Pinto > NQaS group (University of the Basque Country) --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a = browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> = http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ Linux-vrf-general mailing list Lin...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20 http://mail.yahoo.com=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a = browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- _______________________________________________ mpls-linux-general mailing list mpl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general |
|
From: Rich D. <ric...@ya...> - 2007-10-29 14:28:56
|
Hi, Did this get get into the general tree or is it available somewhere? Thanks, Rich d "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: I've managed to process your kernel patch, tomorrow I will work on the iproute2 patch. I applied your patch minus the MPLS code to my vrf-kernel tree. Tomorrow I will create a branch of this tree that will contain your MPLS changes. This weekend I will try to build a FC5 kernel RPM from the vrf-kernel tree and the vrf-mpls-kernel tree and do some testing. Pending the results I'll make them available to the general public via Source Forge. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:19PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi James! > > As I promised last week, here you have mpls-vrf and iproute2 patches. > > We have also designed a website where any of you can find and test some > scenarios we have developed with vnuml. We will continue making tests > related to QoS and updating the website. > > If you want to see our website, please visit http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MPLS/ > > I'm looking forward to hear your comments. > -- > Saludos! > Jon Ander Pic? Pinto > NQaS group (University of the Basque Country) -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ Linux-vrf-general mailing list Lin...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Babu.N <ba...@in...> - 2007-10-29 12:06:24
|
Hi, I have applied this patch to 2.6.19 kernel & am seeing the following compilation issues. Please let me know if there is any fix for this. drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c -============================ error: too few arguments to function 'ip_dev_find' drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c ============================= drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c: In function 'iw_conn_req_handler': drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:1096: error: too few arguments to function 'ip_dev_find' net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c =================== net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c: In function 'fib_create_info': net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:670: error: 'rta' undeclared (first use in this function) net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:670: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:670: error: for each function it appears in.) net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:670: error: too few arguments to function 'fib_count_nexthops' make[2]: *** [net/ipv4/fib_semantics.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [net/ipv4] Error 2 make: *** [net] Error 2 Thanks, Babu At 02:46 AM 9/20/2007, Grant Taylor wrote: >On 09/19/07 07:09, Babu.N wrote: >>I'm using ubuntu 7.04 (which has linux-2.6.20). I would like to >>know if we have a VRF patch for this kernel version. > >To my knowledge, the newest kernel that there is a patch for is 2.6.19. > >>If patch for linux-2.6.20 is not available yet, please let me know >>where to get the patch for 2.6.18/19. I have gone thru the mail >>thread " VRF support for newer kernels ", but it doesn't have >>details about where the patch is available. Please help. > >I found the patch to 2.6.19 and IPTables on the mailing list archive >in the following messages: > >Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 1/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 >(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=46ADDC4B.8010208%40thomson.net&forum_name=linux-vrf-general) > > Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-1.diff.gz > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDC4B.8010208%40thomson.net&counter=1) > >Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 2/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 >(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=46ADDC8C.4030004%40thomson.net&forum_name=linux-vrf-general) > Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-2.diff.gz > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDC8C.4030004%40thomson.net&counter=1) > >Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 3/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 >(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46ADDCB9.3070201%40thomson.net) > > Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-3.diff.gz > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDCB9.3070201%40thomson.net&counter=1) > >Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 4/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 >(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46ADDCDD.1090701%40thomson.net) > Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-4.diff.gz > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDCDD.1090701%40thomson.net&counter=1) > >Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 5/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 >(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46ADDD73.5060807%40thomson.net) > Patch: iproute2-2.6.19-061214-vrf.diff.gz > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDD73.5060807%40thomson.net&counter=1) > > > >Grant. . . . ******************************************************************************** This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. Intoto Inc. |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-10-18 04:54:48
|
I've managed to process your kernel patch, tomorrow I will work on the iproute2 patch. I applied your patch minus the MPLS code to my vrf-kernel tree. Tomorrow I will create a branch of this tree that will contain your MPLS changes. This weekend I will try to build a FC5 kernel RPM from the vrf-kernel tree and the vrf-mpls-kernel tree and do some testing. Pending the results I'll make them available to the general public via Source Forge. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:19PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi James! >=20 > As I promised last week, here you have mpls-vrf and iproute2 patches. >=20 > We have also designed a website where any of you can find and test some > scenarios we have developed with vnuml. We will continue making tests > related to QoS and updating the website. >=20 > If you want to see our website, please visit http://det.bi.ehu.es/NQAS/MP= LS/ >=20 > I'm looking forward to hear your comments. > --=20 > Saludos! > Jon Ander Pic? Pinto > NQaS group (University of the Basque Country) --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Rich D. <ric...@ya...> - 2007-10-16 21:25:24
|
Great!! Please let us know when the website is ready too. Thanks and best regards, Rich d Jon Ander <ne...@gm...> wrote: I'll send the patch to James before friday, now we are developing a website to show some scenarios we have tested. 2007/10/16, Rich DAddio < ric...@ya...>:Hi All, Any word on this patch? Is the integration still on for this week? Thanks and best regards, Rich d "James R. Leu" < jl...@mi...> wrote: Glad to hear you're making progress. I'd be glad to take your patch and integrate it into the appropriate trees. On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them. > > I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch and > probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel. > > The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example > ( http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31116&group_id=15443 > ). > We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one to > LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them > associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one side > of the network to the other side and it works fine. > > Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on aggregated > mode. > > I will send our patch to James next week if he wants. > > -- > Saludos! > Jon Ander > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ Linux-vrf-general mailing list Lin...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general --------------------------------- Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. -- Saludos! Jon Ander ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ Linux-vrf-general mailing list Lin...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general --------------------------------- Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. |
|
From: Jon A. <ne...@gm...> - 2007-10-16 20:28:03
|
I'll send the patch to James before friday, now we are developing a website to show some scenarios we have tested. 2007/10/16, Rich DAddio <ric...@ya...>: > > Hi All, > Any word on this patch? Is the integration still on for this week? > > Thanks and best regards, > > Rich d > > *"James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...>* wrote: > > Glad to hear you're making progress. I'd be glad to take your patch > and integrate it into the appropriate trees. > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > > > I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them. > > > > I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch > and > > probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel. > > > > The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example > > ( > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31116&group_id=15443 > > ). > > We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one > to > > LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them > > associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one > side > > of the network to the other side and it works fine. > > > > Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on > aggregated > > mode. > > > > I will send our patch to James next week if he wants. > > > > -- > > Saludos! > > Jon Ander > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > > -- > James R. Leu > jl...@mi... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> > http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ > Linux-vrf-general mailing list > Lin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general > > > ------------------------------ > Pinpoint customers > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48250/*http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v9.php?o=US2226&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=AprNI&s=Y&s2=EM&b=50>who > are looking for what you sell. > > -- Saludos! Jon Ander |
|
From: Rich D. <ric...@ya...> - 2007-10-16 19:40:13
|
Hi All, Any word on this patch? Is the integration still on for this week? Thanks and best regards, Rich d "James R. Leu" <jl...@mi...> wrote: Glad to hear you're making progress. I'd be glad to take your patch and integrate it into the appropriate trees. On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them. > > I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch and > probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel. > > The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example > (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31116&group_id=15443 > ). > We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one to > LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them > associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one side > of the network to the other side and it works fine. > > Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on aggregated > mode. > > I will send our patch to James next week if he wants. > > -- > Saludos! > Jon Ander > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general -- James R. Leu jl...@mi... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/_______________________________________________ Linux-vrf-general mailing list Lin...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-vrf-general --------------------------------- Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. |
|
From: Jon A. <ne...@gm...> - 2007-10-11 16:04:09
|
Hi James!! I'll send it to you next week. Now we are trying to solve a bug related wit= h=20 rt_cache and multiple VRFs with same IPs. We have also added a new feature to the patch. Now you can associate one=20 incoming label with a VRF and deliver IP traffic to the PE. El Wednesday 10 October 2007 12:48:58 James R. Leu escribi=C3=B3: > Glad to hear you're making progress. I'd be glad to take your patch > and integrate it into the appropriate trees. > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > > > I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them. > > > > I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch > > and probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel. > > > > The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example > > (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=3D31116&group_id= =3D15443 > > ). > > We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one = to > > LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them > > associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one > > side of the network to the other side and it works fine. > > > > Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on > > aggregated mode. > > > > I will send our patch to James next week if he wants. > > > > -- > > Saludos! > > Jon Ander > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls-linux-general mailing list > > mpl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general =2D-=20 Saludos Jon Ander |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-10-10 10:49:10
|
Glad to hear you're making progress. I'd be glad to take your patch and integrate it into the appropriate trees. On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi everybody! >=20 > I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them. >=20 > I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch a= nd > probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel. >=20 > The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example > (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=3D31116&group_id=3D1= 5443 > ). > We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one to > LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them > associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one s= ide > of the network to the other side and it works fine. >=20 > Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on aggregated > mode. >=20 > I will send our patch to James next week if he wants. >=20 > --=20 > Saludos! > Jon Ander > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: Jon A. <ne...@gm...> - 2007-10-10 10:33:40
|
Hi everybody! I'm working in MPLS & VRF projects trying to merge them. I would like to inform all of you that we have merged them into a patch and probed it in a virtual scenario under 2.6.18.1 kernel. The scenario is based on IPv4 MPLS example (http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31116&group_id=15443 ). We have added two more Hosts, one connected to LER1 and the second one to LER2. Then we have created two VRFs in both LERs, each one of them associated to one Host in each LER. Then we have tried to ping from one side of the network to the other side and it works fine. Now we are trying to implement a more complex scenario based on aggregated mode. I will send our patch to James next week if he wants. -- Saludos! Jon Ander |
|
From: Jon A. <ne...@gm...> - 2007-10-08 07:16:28
|
Hi all! I'm testing 2.6.18.1 kernel patch and some doubts come to me. I'm trying to simulate a PE Router with 3 interfaces. One of them (interface 1) is connected to a MPLS Network, the other interfaces (interface 2 & 3) are connected to CE 1 and CE 2 respectively. I would like to create 2 VRFs, one of them including interface 2 and the other one including interface 3. The problem is that if I want to route traffic from interfaces 2 & 3 to the MPLS network, I have to associate interface 1 with both VRFs and as I know, we can only associate one VRF per interface. I have tried to create some virtual interfaces from interface 1 by using "ifconfig eth1:1", but I have seen that they are not real links, they don't appear when you use "ip link show" and that's why I can't associate them with different VRFs. Could any of you give me some ideas to solve the problem?? Thank you very much! -- Saludos! Jon Ander |
|
From: Jon A. <ne...@gm...> - 2007-10-07 17:46:47
|
Hi all! I'm testing 2.6.18.1 kernel patch and some doubts come to me. I'm trying to simulate a PE Router with 3 interfaces. One of them (interface 1) is connected to a MPLS Network, the other interfaces (interface 2 & 3) are connected to CE 1 and CE 2 respectively. I would like to create 2 VRFs, one of them including interface 2 and the other one including interface 3. The problem is that if I want to route traffic from interfaces 2 & 3 to the MPLS network, I have to associate interface 1 with both VRFs and as I know, we can only associate one VRF per interface. I have tried to create some virtual interfaces from interface 1 by using "ifconfig eth1:1", but I have seen that they are not real links, they don't appear when you use "ip link show" and that's why I can't associate them with different VRFs. Could any of you give me some ideas to solve the problem?? Thank you very much! -- Saludos! Jon Ander |
|
From: Grant T. <gt...@ri...> - 2007-09-19 21:16:24
|
On 09/19/07 07:09, Babu.N wrote: > I'm using ubuntu 7.04 (which has linux-2.6.20). I would like to know > if we have a VRF patch for this kernel version. To my knowledge, the newest kernel that there is a patch for is 2.6.19. > If patch for linux-2.6.20 is not available yet, please let me know > where to get the patch for 2.6.18/19. I have gone thru the mail > thread " VRF support for newer kernels ", but it doesn't have details > about where the patch is available. Please help. I found the patch to 2.6.19 and IPTables on the mailing list archive in the following messages: Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 1/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=46ADDC4B.8010208%40thomson.net&forum_name=linux-vrf-general) Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-1.diff.gz (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDC4B.8010208%40thomson.net&counter=1) Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 2/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=46ADDC8C.4030004%40thomson.net&forum_name=linux-vrf-general) Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-2.diff.gz (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDC8C.4030004%40thomson.net&counter=1) Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 3/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46ADDCB9.3070201%40thomson.net) Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-3.diff.gz (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDCB9.3070201%40thomson.net&counter=1) Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 4/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46ADDCDD.1090701%40thomson.net) Patch: linux-2.6.19-vrf-4.diff.gz (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDCDD.1090701%40thomson.net&counter=1) Message: [Linux-vrf-general] [PATCH 5/5] VRF support for 2.6.19 (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46ADDD73.5060807%40thomson.net) Patch: iproute2-2.6.19-061214-vrf.diff.gz (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=linux-vrf-general&message_id=46ADDD73.5060807%40thomson.net&counter=1) Grant. . . . |
|
From: Babu.N <ba...@in...> - 2007-09-19 12:09:15
|
Hi, I'm using ubuntu 7.04 (which has linux-2.6.20). I would like to know if we have a VRF patch for this kernel version. If patch for linux-2.6.20 is not available yet, please let me know where to get the patch for 2.6.18/19. I have gone thru the mail thread "<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46017E9A.8010801%40thomson.net>VRF support for newer kernels ", but it doesn't have details about where the patch is available. Please help. Thanks, Babu ******************************************************************************** This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. Intoto Inc. |
|
From: Flavio C. <lis...@no...> - 2007-08-31 08:03:45
|
Hello We run a VPN-Concentrator where multiple VPNs terminate on a Cisco in seperate VRF instances. These VPNs are not reachable from the internet. Now in order to monitor inside these VRF instances, I'd like to setup a monitor host. I already setup linux-vrf, with multiple vrf instaces, which can reach the hosts inside those vrfs. Now I'd like to NAT certain ip's on vrf 0 eth0 to IPs inside a certain VRF. Lets say I have vrf 0: eth0: 192.168.10.1, 192.168.10.2, 192.168.10.3 vrf 1: eth1.1: 192.168.254.2 192.168.255.0/24 via 192.168.254.1 vrf 2: eth1.1: 192.168.254.2 192.168.255.0/24 via 192.168.254.1 vrf 3: eth1.1: 192.168.254.2 192.168.255.0/24 via 192.168.254.1 Now i want the following NATs: 192.168.10.1 vrf 0 <-> 192.168.255.10 vrf 1 192.168.10.2 vrf 0 <-> 192.168.255.10 vrf 2 192.168.10.3 vrf 0 <-> 192.168.255.10 vrf 3 Is this somehow possible? Thank you and kind regards Flavio Curti -- http://no-way.org/~fcu/ |
|
From: Grant T. <gt...@ri...> - 2007-08-30 06:40:25
|
I believe the following is possible to do using Linux-VRF, but I'd like
some confirmation if at all possible. I think that I can make what I'm
wanting to do work if I make each "Context" be a different VRF. Am I
any where close?
With out going in to too much detail, I am effectively wanting to do the
following.
I want to be able to take traffic in from a local LAN on eth0 and route
it out eth1 to a default gateway with a static IP. I want said default
gateway with the static IP to be assigned to eth2. I then want to route
and masquerade traffic that came in eth2 out eth3.
(Enter ASCII art)
--------------+
Context 0 |
+------+ +-----------+
+---+ eth0 |------+ Local LAN |
| +------+ +-----------+
| |
| +------+
+---+ eth1 +---+
+------+ |
| |
==============|===|===
Context 1 | |
+------+ |
+---+ eth2 +---+
| +------+
| |
| +------+ +----------+
+---+ eth3 +------+ Internet |
+------+ +----------+
|
--------------+
Note: eth1 and eth2 are not real ethernet interfaces. They are
effectively tunnel like and are NOARP interfaces.
I want the ""router in context 0 to effectively (for the sake of
discussion) do basic static NAT routing for the local LAN. This router
will have two static IP addresses, LAN facing and upstream router facing.
I want the ""router in context 1 to effectively (for the sake of
discussion) do basic MASQUERADing for the equipment behind it. This
router will have one static IP facing the LAN and one dynamic IP facing
its upstream provider.
Grant. . . .
|
|
From: Grant T. <gt...@ri...> - 2007-08-30 06:39:24
|
On 8/30/2007 12:23 AM, Grant Taylor wrote: > What is the current state of VRF for any of the recent 2.6 kernels? I > know there was supposedly a big patch for 2.6.19 that was in the works, > but I am unable to find it. Disregard. After getting my browser to cooperate I found said patches to kernel 2.6.19 and iproute2 in the mailing list archive. Grant. . . . |
|
From: Grant T. <gt...@ri...> - 2007-08-30 05:23:13
|
What is the current state of VRF for any of the recent 2.6 kernels? I know there was supposedly a big patch for 2.6.19 that was in the works, but I am unable to find it. Can / will any one help me out here please and thank you. :) Grant. . . . |
|
From: Clement M. <cle...@th...> - 2007-08-14 14:21:04
|
Hello, I am interested in the port of linux-vrf to 2.6.18.1. Can you publish the patch on this list ? (or tell me where I overlooked it :) ) Regards, On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:22:14 +0200, James R. Leu <jl...@mi...> wrote: > Some additional noteis. If you would like me to post the patch in my > development tree or on SF, let me know. I also have a location for > just posting files for people interested doing testing. > > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:52:12AM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: >> Hi everybody! >> >> I would like to inform that I have upgraded VRF project to 2.6.18.1. >> I have a patch for 2.6.18.1 that supports both, MPLS & VRF separately. >> I've >> been testing it with vnuml and it seems to work fine. >> I also have patched iproute2 to support both. >> I would appreciate any idea of how to implement RFC 2547bis (maybe it >> would >> be better to implement first a static routing). >> >> -- >> Saludos! >> Jon Ander Pico Pinto >> >> *NQaS "Network, Quality and Security Research Group"* >> >> *University of the Basque Country >> * >> >> Escuela T?cnica Superior de Ingenier?a de Bilbao >> Al. Urquijo s/n >> 48011 Bilbao >> >> Spain > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. >> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. >> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. >> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls-linux-general mailing list >> mpl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general > > -- Clément Moreau <cle...@th...> Thomson - APDG 46 Quai Le Gallo 92100 Boulogne (France) |
|
From: Chris R. <Chr...@nr...> - 2007-08-09 09:44:26
|
James Please do post the file and let us know where they are. Further, I have just completed making modifications to MPLS-linux 1.956 so it at least compiles with kernel 2.6.22-1.45 if test sgo well then I can move toward update the vrf-linux files toward its integration into the 2547bis roadmap.... Also, I have cat'ed all the kernel patch files, do I just post this file in my P4 root tree or move each modified file into tree? thanks..... James R. Leu wrote: > Some additional noteis. If you would like me to post the patch in my > development tree or on SF, let me know. I also have a location for > just posting files for people interested doing testing. > > -- Christopher Robson Senior Computer Scientist, GS-15 Naval Research Laboratory Center for Computational Science Networking, Code 5591 4555 Overlook ave. Washington, D.C. 20375-5320 (COM) 202-404-3138 (VoIP) 2024043138@GIGEF (CHAT) Chris.Robson@GIGEF |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-08-09 03:25:37
|
Some additional noteis. If you would like me to post the patch in my development tree or on SF, let me know. I also have a location for just posting files for people interested doing testing. On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:52:12AM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi everybody! >=20 > I would like to inform that I have upgraded VRF project to 2.6.18.1. > I have a patch for 2.6.18.1 that supports both, MPLS & VRF separately. I'= ve > been testing it with vnuml and it seems to work fine. > I also have patched iproute2 to support both. > I would appreciate any idea of how to implement RFC 2547bis (maybe it wou= ld > be better to implement first a static routing). >=20 > --=20 > Saludos! > Jon Ander Pico Pinto >=20 > *NQaS "Network, Quality and Security Research Group"* >=20 > *University of the Basque Country > * >=20 > Escuela T?cnica Superior de Ingenier?a de Bilbao > Al. Urquijo s/n > 48011 Bilbao >=20 > Spain > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
|
From: James R. L. <jl...@mi...> - 2007-08-09 03:24:09
|
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:52:12AM +0200, Jon Ander wrote: > Hi everybody! >=20 > I would like to inform that I have upgraded VRF project to 2.6.18.1. > I have a patch for 2.6.18.1 that supports both, MPLS & VRF separately. I'= ve > been testing it with vnuml and it seems to work fine. > I also have patched iproute2 to support both. > I would appreciate any idea of how to implement RFC 2547bis (maybe it wou= ld > be better to implement first a static routing). There is a patch out there that integrates linux-vrf support into quagga. Merging that with my MPLS patch for quagga would be a great starting point. > --=20 > Saludos! > Jon Ander Pico Pinto >=20 > *NQaS "Network, Quality and Security Research Group"* >=20 > *University of the Basque Country > * >=20 > Escuela T?cnica Superior de Ingenier?a de Bilbao > Al. Urquijo s/n > 48011 Bilbao >=20 > Spain > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > mpls-linux-general mailing list > mpl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general --=20 James R. Leu jl...@mi... |
3 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
