[LV-kern-commit] CVS: kernel-2.4/include/asm-vax/mm pgalloc.h,1.1,1.2

[Kenn H. <ke...@us...>]

Update of /cvsroot/linux-vax/kernel-2.4/include/asm-vax/mm
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv29747/mm

Modified Files:
	pgalloc.h 
Log Message:
Add flush_tlb_pgtables()

Index: pgalloc.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/linux-vax/kernel-2.4/include/asm-vax/mm/pgalloc.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- pgalloc.h	2001/01/17 16:18:52	1.1
+++ pgalloc.h	2001/02/05 00:04:21	1.2
@@ -222,6 +222,12 @@
 		__flush_tlb();
 }
 
+static inline void flush_tlb_pgtables(struct mm_struct *mm, 
+			unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+	/* nothing to do on VAX */
+}
+
 #else
 
 /* FIXME: SMP - another day perhaps */
@@ -282,6 +288,15 @@
 	flush_tlb_mm(mm);
 }
 
+static inline void flush_tlb_pgtables(struct mm_struct *mm, 
+			unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+	/* FIXME: do we need to notify other CPUs that a process
+	   page table is going away?  I don't think so...
+
+	   But what if two processes are sharing this mm_struct and
+	   are currently running on two different CPUs? */
+}
 
 #else
 
@@ -306,6 +321,18 @@
 {
 	flush_tlb();
 }
+
+static inline void flush_tlb_pgtables(struct mm_struct *mm, 
+			unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+	/* FIXME: do we need to notify other CPUs that a process
+	   page table is going away?  I don't think so...
+
+	   But what if two processes are sharing this mm_struct and
+	   are currently running on two different CPUs? */
+}
+
+
 #endif /* clever_smp_invalidate */
 #endif /* smp */