|
From: Andi K. <ak...@su...> - 2004-05-12 14:03:22
|
On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:43:37 +0100 Anton Altaparmakov <ai...@ca...> wrote: > Hi Andi, Andrew, Linus, > > x86_64 has incorrect include/asm-x86_64/bitops.h::ffs() implementation. > It uses "g" instead of "rm" in the insline assembled bsfl instruction. > (This was spotted by Yuri Per.) > > bsfl does not accept constant values but only memory ones. On i386 the > correct "rm" is used. > > This causes NTFS build to fail as gcc optimizes a variable into a > constant and ffs() then fails to assemble. > > Please apply below patch. Thanks! Thanks. I applied it to my tree. -Andi |
