|
From: Anton A. <ai...@ca...> - 2004-05-12 08:02:07
|
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 03:37, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 2004, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 16:10, fl...@bg... wrote: > > > published with no mail address at http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3070 : > > > CC fs/ntfs/logfile.o > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > > {standard input}:137: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `bsf' > > > > > > gcc --version > > > gcc (GCC) 3.4.0 > > > > > > happens on 3.2.3 as well. > > > ----------------------- > > > I haven't tried that myself > > > > Thanks. I hadn't seen that. I replied asking for their binutils > > version... > > Are you aware it's probably opteron related? Perhaps incorrect assembly > in one of the (implicitely) included asm-x86_64 header files (or bad > binutils)? Oh, yes, I think it is binutils. It would still be nice to find out what is failing and whether the kernel can/needs to work around it... The person who wrote the report emailed me with details and I asked for the .s file for logfile.c so I can match up the line number to the instruction but I have had no reply yet... Best regards, Anton -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ |
